I am no digital native. In fact, last April I celebrated my 40th birthday. However, the impact of technology on my recent life and this blog are undeniable. There have been a recent string of “firsts” for me concerning technology. First, I wrote (actually talked) the first draft of this essay using the Dragon speech-to-text program. The first draft was not perfect, but this is the intended outcome whether I type on the keyboard or now talk into the microphone. A second technological impact on this essay is reading I have been doing for this doctoral course. The first required reading for the course has been 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in our Times by Bernie Trilling and Charles Fadel. After purchasing an ipad, I went to ibooks and purchased this book. I can now say I have read my first book on an ipad. The book has certainly added to my depth of understanding about technology and there are connections to our second required reading that I will attempt to make. The third major impact of technology on my recent life is that I can now call myself a blogger. I have created several blogs to facilitate communication with administrators in my district. The blogs have a different and more conversational tone making email feel more formal now.
It is interesting that we have been asked to read a chapter about online youth authorship while I have been struggling with several of the same issues explored in the chapter, “Producing Sites, Exploring Identities: Youth Online Authorship” by Susannah Stern.
The viewpoint that Stern presents in this chapter is important. She intentionally moves the focus from what teens produce online to why teens are compelled to express themselves with personal sites (personal websites and blogs). As Stern (2008) describes, “My goal throughout this chapter is to illuminate how we might broaden the terrain for discussion about online youth expression practices, so that our public and popular discourse about young people is more meaningful and contextualized” (p. 96).
The chapter has four important areas that are addressed. First, what motivates young people to create personal sites. Second, the audience for whom the young authors are writing. Third, the factors that impact young authors’ choices about self-presentation are considered. Lastly, the issue of self-appraisal and audience feedback is explored. (Stern, p. 99). Reading the chapter by Stern through the lenses of technology, education, and society is very productive. As an educator, it is important that we consider how schools might incorporate the tools and avenues that students may be using in their personal lives to enhance the educational experience. The important 21st century skill of communication could certainly be addressed by expecting students to write and reflect through a blog about important issues and topics. Many of the goals we seek to reach in schools are being met by students through personal sites. The chapter cites youth authors feeling ownership in their sites, learning by doing through site creation, expressive writing with an intended audience in mind, and self-realization through writing and reflective thinking.
Chimamanda Adichie describes the dangers of a single story in her TED talk filmed in July, 2009 located at: http:///www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story.html
In education we often proclaim that each child is unique and has a unique story to tell. Perhaps allowing the uniqueness and creativity of each child to be developed through a blog will be a productive avenue for his or her self-discovery and tap into the student’s motivation to participate with a “web presence” in a world that often overlooks the thoughts and ideas of the young.
Dennis
ReplyDeleteThe last paragraph stating, "In education we often proclaim that each child is unique and has a unique story to tell. Perhaps allowing the uniqueness and creativity of each child to be developed through a blog will be a productive avenue for his or her self-discovery and tap into the student’s motivation to participate with a “web presence” in a world that often overlooks the thoughts and ideas of the young", provided a nice positive closure to the concepts and benefits of using adolescent authorship to facilitate self-discovery. Well said!
Dennis, thank you for reintroducing me to Chimamanda Adichie’s incredible lecture. I have seen it in a previous class.
ReplyDeleteBlogs allow students to expand the single story that so often is restricted and/or confined through stereotypical labeling experienced in school. So often identities are squashed amidst conformity and peer acceptance. Adichie so eloquently embraces this when she states “show a people as one thing over and over again, and that is what they become” (2009). The blog allows the identification of uniqueness instead of sameness.
As I struggle with how to incorporate a blog into language arts curriculum, I must address the culture of the classroom as confining or restraining the freedom a blog empowers. Do educational expectations become a restriction, and therefore a kind of undermining to the essence that is a blog? Even if the blog is used for “students to write and reflect…about important issues and topics” would the presence of a teacher inhibit depth and authenticity?
Dennis, I love that you connected Chimamanda Adichie's lecture to the potential for blogs. It seems like connecting her ideas regarding single stories fits wonderfully with both the limitations and possibilities of youth and blogging. For instance, as Adichie describes the limitations of single stories, so might blogs limit the "face" of a given individual when they use mini-blogging or Social Network Sites to conform or project a limited identity using fad-like memes.
ReplyDeleteOn the contrary, blogs also offer the opportunity to empower and explore the limitless complexities of identity. Jill's questions regarding the impact of teachers are powerful. As with any curriculum, the structure/ limitation/ purpose of blogging and the articulations teachers use to describe it will direct how students use it and the possible depth of exploration or meaning students get from such an activity.
An interesting conundrum I see is that structure often helps the students really focus more in depth. That is, a particular assignment (non fiction essay regarding how you view popularity), often allows students to explore in a safe and honest manner. As well, complete open assignments and blogs are useful to spur creativity.
Much like the differing types of inquiry instruction (completely open, based on step/ structured, and challenges more in the vein of autonomous learner model), the differing concepts and methods of instruction and blogging all have their purpose and result.
Thank you for your comments. The inclusion of personal sites in education is a conundrum. Will honest expression be eliminated? Will the co-opting of this form of expression by teachers and schools cause it to be rejected? I think these are questions we need to have the youth answer. If we utilize personal sites in lesson plans with little participation, we need to find the causes. Is it lack of access by the students, is it some of the possible reactions I put forth above? The complementary narrative to the Stern chapter would be getting feedback from youth who reject participation in personal sites and/or reject the inclusion of personal sites in formal education. Like many things in education, we won't know until we try.
ReplyDelete